About three weeks ago, I managed to watch a re-run of the movie Conspiracy Theory starring Mel Gibson and Julia Roberts . When it was first released in 1997, I’m sure the vast majority of viewers saw it as just an enjoyable work of fiction but had no validity in ‘real’ life . Mel Gibson and Patrick Stewart ham it up splendidly and Julia Roberts is good as the heroine, Alice . ( Alice in Wonderland for those who didn’t get it – see Eyes Wide Shut, as well ) .
Jerry, the hero is obsessed with conspiracy theories, who everyone views as an eccentric but likeable loner and is suddenly thrown into his own conspiracy . With the attacks in Norway by Anders Behring Breivik, Jerry would have been in his element and playing ‘Jerry’, I will show the elements of the Norway shooting and bomb blast, which he would have used in his arguments .
- The numerology of the date : 22+7+2+1+1=33 . 33 is a master number precious to Freemasonry .
- The picture of Anders Breivik dressed up as a Freemason .
- Breivik referred to himself as ‘Justiciar Knight’s Commander of the Knights’ Templar’ .
- 22/7 was the anniversary of the coronation of Godfroi de Bouillon as ruler of Jerusalem, after the First Crusade .
- The dodgy Facebook page of Breivik . The images of Breivik seem to show three people who appear similar but different, and the images of him as a Mason and with a gun look suspiciously photoshopped .
- “Lone gunmen assassins always have three names” . As soon as his name was released, the media referred to him as Anders Behring Breivik – see Lee Harvey Oswald, Jared Lee Loughner, James Earl Ray etc . As far as I can tell, those who knew him just called him Anders .
- Almost immediately after the events, the police started saying Breivik was a lone gunman when witnesses at Utoya island said there was another individual on the island involved in the shootings . According to the script, on his own, Breivik managed to blow up half of Oslo and then travel to the island and murder scores of youths .
- Breivik had been monitored by the Norwegian security services since March and was able to buy a huge amount of fertiliser without any action being taken .
- The police admitted a guard should have been at the island but didn’t turn up ! Nothing more has been heard about this – i.e . who was the guard and where was he/she ?
- Who are the well connected people Breivik met in London in 2002 to refound The Knights’ Templar ?
- Who is his mentor, Richard the Lionheart ?
The script for the Norway attacks could have been written by Dan Brown with Freemasons, Knights’ Templars and Crusaders but this is real life, and real people were killed and injured . Since Conspiracy Theory was released, too much water has passed under the bridge and ordinary people are prepared to consider conspiracy theories, even if they do not believe them . In 1997, Jerry was laughed at – nobody’s laughing any more .
Update 31/7/11 : Breivik paramilitary training in Belarus . Please read the comment below by Newtheory in the comments section .
As you might know the following story has surfaced in Russian media:
“Breivik ‘underwent paramilitary training in Belarus’
Norway’s twin terror suspect Anders Behring Breivik trained at a secret paramilitary field camp in Belarus earlier this year, a Belarusian opposition politician said on Thursday, citing security sources.
“Breivik visited Belarus several times. This spring, as part of his preparations for his twin attacks, he visited Minsk, where he underwent training at a secret paramilitary field camp,” Mikhail Reshetnikov, the head of the opposition Belarusian Party of Patriots, told the Gazeta.ru online newspaper.
He cited sources within Belarus’s “security organs.”
Breivik, 32, has admitted to carrying out a bombing in Oslo, which killed eight, and a mass shooting at a Labor Party youth camp on the nearby island of Utoya, which left 68 dead. He has not accepted criminal responsibility, however, saying his actions were “atrocious but necessary” measures intended to “save Norway and Western Europe” from a “Muslim takeover.”
Breivik mentioned in his online manifesto visiting Belarus to study the effects of fallout from the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster. The former Soviet republic’s state border agency has confirmed he was in Belarus from March 4 to March 11, 2005.
Reshetnikov also claimed Breivik had participated in “sabotage-terrorism drills” under a former Belarusian special service officer and that he had used a fake passport to enter Belarus.
“His codename in Belarus’s KGB was Viking,” he added. “Rumors say he also had a girlfriend in Belarus.”
“The theory that Belarus’ special forces were involved in training Anders Breivik seems, of course, far-fetched,” political expert Viktor Demidov was quoted by Gazeta.ru as saying.
“On the other hand, [Belarusian] President Alexander Lukashenko’s friendship with Muammar Gaddafi is no secret – neither is his fondness for Adolf Hitler.”
Norway is taking part in NATO operations in Libya and Gaddafi has threatened attacks against Europe. ”
http://en.rian.ru/world/20110728/165436665.html
It is confirmed that Breivik was in Belarus 2005 but the russian claims that he has deen there two more times has not been confiremd from what I know.
Breivik writes a lot about eastern Europe in hes compendium. He knows a lot and takes positions in subjects that no one else knows of. For instance Breivik comes up with a strange unheard of theory that the Chernobyl incident was in fact caused by nationalist terrorist sabotage. He also said this was one of the main reasons for the collapse of Sovjet. How did he come up with this?
Here is an article about Breiviks extensive knowledge of the balcans and the conflicts there:
http://rss.economist.com/blogs/easte…orway-killings
Russian media points out Valery Lunev as the one responible for Breiviks training. Google his name and you will get strange links connecting the name to the sovjet collapse and even 9/11.
Here is an article about the situation in Belarus:
http://www.indexoncensorship.org/201…ly-on-the-web/
So there seems to be connections between Breivik and old Sovjet intelligencepeople. You might ask how and in what way they vere involved. I think the answer lies in this text.
From GRU defector Viktor Suvorov’s book Spetsnaz:
“Soviet secret police, the KGB, carries out different functions (than the Spetsnaz) and has other priorities. It has its own terrorist apparatus, which includes an organization very similar to spetsnaz, known as osnaz. The KGB uses osnaz for carrying out a range of tasks not dissimilar to those performed by the GRU’s spetsnaz. But the Soviet leaders consider that it is best not to have any monopolies in the field of secret warfare. Competition, they feel, gives far better results than ration.
[...]
The recruitment of a full-blown terrorist is a very different matter from the recruitment of an informer-agent. The terrorist has to go through very tough training which becomes a daily, and a nightly nightmare. He dreams of the training coming to an end: he yearns for the real thing. The instructors talk to him and ask him what he would like, as a terrorist, to do. The terrorist tells them. The instructors then ‘think about it’ and a few days later tell him it is not possible. The torture of the training continues. Again the question of what he wants to do is raised, and again he is turned down. Various reasons are given for refusing him: we value your life too highly to send you on such a risky mission; such an act might have unwanted repercussions on your family, your comrades, and so on. Thus the range of choice is gradually narrowed down until the terrorist suggests exactly what the heads of Soviet Military intelligence want. They ‘think about it’ for a few days and finally give their agreement in such a way that it does not appear to be something wanted by the GRU but rather a compromise or a concession to the terrorist: if he really thinks it necessary to do it, no obstacles will be put in his way.
I have of course simplified a process which is in practice a very complicated affair.
The reward for the GRU is that a terrorist doing work for spetsnaz does not, in the great majority of cases, suspect he is being used. He is utterly convinced that he is acting independently, of his own will and by his own choice. The GRU does not leave its signature or his fingerprints around.
Even in cases where it is not a question of individual terrorists but of experienced leaders of terrorist organisations, the GRU takes extraordinary steps to ensure that not only all outsiders but even the terrorist leader himself should not realise the extent of his subordination to spetsnaz and consequently to the GRU. The leader of the terrorists has a vast field of action and a wide choice. But there are operations and acts of terrorism on which spetsnaz will spend any amount of money, will provide any kind of weapon, will help in obtaining passports and will organise hiding places. But there are also terrorist acts for which spetsnaz has no money, no weapons, no reliable people and no hiding places. The leader of the terrorists is at complete liberty to choose the mission he wants, but without weapons, money and other forms of support his freedom to choose is suddenly severely curtailed.”
Please investigate this or spread it along. Thank you.
Hi Newtheory . Thanks for that – to me that blows the lone gunman theory out of the window . I have no personal experience who gets selected for paramilitary training, but I would imagine you can’t just turn up and say ‘please give me training’ and hey presto, you are turned into an assassin .
Presumably, he would have had a form of reference from a friendly power and if he was given a code name as well, it shows he was of some importance to someone . You could select about four or five countries but my intuition leads me to London and the mysterious ‘Richard the Lionheart’ .
Good point. “Richard” could have been the scout that handed over Breivik to whatever group he met in Belarus.
These are less based on on fact or foundation, but merely observations.
Oslo – Anagram of ‘Solo’
Another interesting note about anagrams.
The use of 3 names, could be linked to this… An average name, forename/surname can create up to several 1000′s of anagrams but usually much much less, whereas a 3 Name system can produce 10′s of thousands, or more. (it’s easier to hide words in a 3 name systems, without it seeming like an anagram)
Anders Breivik – 11049 Anders Behring Breivik – 75,001
year 2011
Lee Oswald – 533 Lee Harvey Oswald – 100,001
year 1963
Jared Loughner – 2950 Jared Lee Loughner – 57,751
year 2011
John Booth – 7 John Wilkes Booth – 17,056
year 1865
the glaring exceptions:
Mark David Chapman – 59 Mark David Chapman – 3315
year 1955
James Earl Ray – 40 James Earl Ray – 2163
year 1969
Add to this the fact that ‘Anders Behring Breivik’s code name was ‘Viking’
a n d e r s b e h r I N G b r e i V I K
in fact there are 20340 returns for anagrams of his full name when it must contain the word ‘VIKING’
However, it could be something as simple as this… 3 Names, are MUCH more memorable than 2.
What is strange, and worth considering though… I have a Middle name, but I never use it.. if I were to commit a crime tomorrow and be in the papers, They would print my 2 Names, no reason to use my middle name, as I RARELY do…
Mark Chapman – 59 Mark David Chapman – 3315
James Ray – 40 James Earl Ray – 2163
(sorry for the posting error here)
Hi Coincidence – great spot about Viking . I think you are onto something – I noticed something similar with the surname of Rosie Huntington Whiteley, the star of the recent Transformers 3 film, which includes the surnames of Huntley and Whiting, who are both infamous childkillers in Britain .
I don’t know whether its deliberate and man made, or some unconscious force which connects everything together .
I don’t know anyone who uses their middle name – why do the media ?
anyone who has the time and the patience to go through the anagrams can use http://www.angelfire.com/biz/WLAW/anagram.html
Thats fun – for anybody who uses it, I found it only worked if you enter the names without a break . It maybe just my browser, though .
Hmm… I just noticed something else… and well.. this is a HUGE coincidence!
perhaps YOU are on to something with the whole ‘conspiracy theory film’
America came under fire recently when it ‘came out’ that the operation name for the Osama Mission, was ‘Geronimo’
This is a quote from ‘conspiracy theory’
Jerry Fletcher: Love gives you wings. It makes you fly. I don’t even call it love. I call it Geronimo. When you’re in love, you’ll jump right from the top of the Empire State and you won’t care, screaming “Geronimo” the whole way down. I love her so bad, I just… whoa, she wrecks me. I’d die for her.
probably coincidence…. or maybe they are just having fun with us…
here’s another quote from the same film
Dr. Jonas: Years ago I worked for the CIA on the MK ULTRA program. Are you familiar with it?
Alice Sutton: It was mind control. “Manchurian Candidate” kind of stuff.
Dr. Jonas: That’s a vulgar generalization. But yes, you take an ordinary man an turn him into an assassin. That was our goal.
The Geronimo phrase jumped out at me as well when I watched the film as I’ve seen it turn up in other things eg the current Dr Who uses it quite a bit and there’s something else I’ve seen it in, which I cannot remember . I don’t know whether it has any significance and I think its one of those things which you put to the back of the mind for future reference .
The only two films I’ve seen in the last six months are The Wicker Man, which was about a sacrifice at Beltane, a week before the’death’ of Osama at Beltane and Conspiracy Theory, two weeks before the Norway attacks . My intuition seems to be working overtime
PS – thanks for your interest and comments to my blog – it is greatly appreciated .
Just a fact!
One of Breiviks first victims was a policeman (he worked there as a guard not an officer), he worked as a private guard and has done so in several years for the camp.
might need some google translate: http://politiken.dk/udland/ECE1344743/breivik-draebte-politimand-paa-utoeya/
Another important point is that Breivik wanted to speak in english, and use his self-made uniform.
Even though he worked alone, someone could help, by just close the eyes… PST (the Norwegian FBI), has registered that he bought chemicals, the antiracism groups know about him.
Training in Russia is not so hard, a lot of rightwing extremist do that here in Scandinavia.
Breivik claimed to be friends with leading gangs in Oslo, but they had put a reward on his head – for the murders and for discrase of their name – friends …no
Thanks Mich – I find the story he could arrange this all on his own difficult to believe . When the IRA planted a bomb in Britain they would have teams of about 6 to arrange it .
“Hi Coincidence – great spot about Viking . I think you are onto something – I noticed something similar with the surname of Rosie Huntington Whiteley, the star of the recent Transformers 3 film, which includes the surnames of Huntley and Whiting, who are both infamous childkillers in Britain .
I don’t know whether its deliberate and man made, or some unconscious force which connects everything together .
I don’t know anyone who uses their middle name – why do the media ?”
It works really well if you ignore the fact that her name doesn’t include the words ‘Huntley’ or ‘Whiting’, but are rather ‘Huntington’ and ‘Whiteley’.
“Thanks Mich – I find the story he could arrange this all on his own difficult to believe . When the IRA planted a bomb in Britain they would have teams of about 6 to arrange it .”
This of course is a good idea if you are planning a bombing campaign. ‘Cos if you send one person to perform the bombing campaign and he or she is caught or blows themselves up setting the timer on the first day – that’s the end of the campaign!
Plus its a good idea that if you are mounting a nationwide bombing campaign, you have a dedicated bomb-maker, perhaps a quatermaster (to keep the bomb-making materials apart until they are ready to be constructed), enough people to perform sentry functions 24×7, enough people to perform a reconnoitre of the intended target beforehand…and seeing as the distances involved can be considerable in a national bombing campaign, it is useful to have a driver or two on-hand.
Of course one-man bombing campaigns are perfectly possible. The Unabomber Theodore Kaczynski managed 17 bombings in 20 years and killed three people. Maintaining an intense sustained campaign with just one individual involved can be somewhat difficult.
Though constructing conspiracies can be fun, to make them sound at least vaguely convincing it is good to consider that the obvious might be the sensible approach.
You say ‘considering the obvious might be a sensible approach’ . To be honest, I think the idea that Breivik blew up the middle of Oslo all on his own is not very likely . For a non military man to construct such a bomb is quite something especially as he was on a Norwegian security services watch list .
It’s not the official story I question – it’s Breivik’s story he acted on his own as dubious . I think it would be the first time a ‘lone wolf’ has been able to commit such a large atrocity . The police arrest Breivik-he says ‘I did on my own’ and they immediately believe him . Case closed and lets move on, as Tony Blair liked to say . If an IRA man had said ‘I did it on my own’ would he have been believed ?
Why the obvious isn’t always ‘obvious’ – Nick Pope Confirms UFO Dirty Tricks .
while (defined ($line = ))
{
if ($line =~ /^.*?$nic_id:1\s+/)
{
$nic_act=”\(active\)”;
}
else
{
$nic_act=”\(inactive\)”;
}
close STRIPPED_IFCONFIG_FILE;
if($conf_link)
{
print “\tX25 link /dev/$hihp_dev is configured in config file $conf_link\n”;
last;
}
else
{
print “\tNo X25 links defined for this HSI card.\n”;
last;
}
I’m guessing that to maintain this conspiracy theory requires frequent instances of ignoring key facts. I believe the term is ‘swallowing the camel’. I’m being invited to swallow the camel here, to just accept the theory and not worry about a few glaring inaccuracies.
For instance what does ‘he was on a Norwegian security services watch list’ mean in reality? Norway isn’t particularly known for having a large security services infrastructure – not for a country where you can meet an unaccompanied government minister on the streets of Oslo. So what would being on a ‘watch list’ mean?
Perhaps it could mean, well, being on a list. As in if you come to further attention and you are on the list, perhaps we might make some enquiries about you.
Except of course you will be on the list with others, perhaps quite a lot of others;
“Anders Breivik has been on a Norwegian security service watch list since March according to reports in the country.
Newspaper VG Nett reports that the killer was put on a list after reportedly buying large amounts of fertiliser from an online shop in Poland.
His name was among 60 passed to the Police Security Service (PST) by Norwegian Customs as having used the store to buy products.
But the flag was considered not to be relevant by the PST as he was thought to have been buying the chemicals to use on his farm.”
http://www.tedmontgomery.com/remarks/Norway/AndersBreivik.html
So now our man is on the watch list, with 59 new ones supplied by the Customs department. Of course nothing to distinquish him from the other 59 buyers of chemicals for his farm.
Is this supposed to be the core of the conspiracy theory that he acted with others? When you say ‘I think the idea that Breivik blew up the middle of Oslo all on his own is not very likely’. Is there some reason why he couldn’t, or am I missing something?
Say he did something like this;
* Purchased all the raw materials over time and had them delivered to his farm
* Constructed car/van bombs using the raw materials and timers using instructions reasonably easily found on the web.
* Drove the vehicles to Oslo, having to return to the farm by bus/taxi if it was the first vehicle.
* Got back to the farm, picked up his guns and dodgy police uniform and drove himself to Utoya Island, and succeeded in getting there or thereabouts before the bombs went off.
Seems pretty simple to me. Didn’t involve any accomplices, Mind Control, 12′ alien reptiles, UFO’s, the CIA or any other devious constructions. Just one bloke, a major chip on his shoulder, a privileged background, enough time and money and a good location to construct his bombs, a country where owning a rifle isn’t so unusual, and all done in a region of the world with a normally-unarmed police force and a tiny security agency.
Although not very ‘sexy’ sometimes the obvious explanation, which doesn’t require the suspension of disbelief, will suffice. The best conspiracy theories are the ones that appear believable without having to swallow the camel.
If you say so – I wager you £10- in ten years time, we will have discovered there were others involved . I don’t know who and I doubt very much if he was alone but it looks like we’ll have to disagree .